Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022)

An Inquiry into the Problems Concerning Filipino Values and Norms

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj2210.01.03
Submitted
March 31, 2022
Published
May 27, 2022
FULL PAPER

Keywords

  • Filipino
  • values
  • norms
  • validity
  • efficacy
  • problems

Abstract

This paper inquires into the problems concerning Filipino values and moral norms. Based on the interviews with the social science and philosophy scholars and the youth leaders in the Philippines, the study identifies the following problems: Filipino identity, distortion and dysfunctionalization, manifold ambivalence, dissonance, false justification and misuse, cynicism, and decline of moral courage. Analyzed based on Hans Kelsen?s concept of validity and efficacy, the problems prove to be radical given that the purported Filipino values system is actually a chaotic constellation of competing and conflicting pre-colonial, colonial, and postcolonial normative paradigms. Distorted, ambivalent, and dysfunctionalized, Filipino values and norms fail to provide effective normative guidelines. The proposed antidote of moral and values education is bound to be futile in the face of a severely mutilated social conscience.

References

  1. Aguas, J. J. S. (2016). The Filipino value of pakikipagpagkapwa-tao vis-à -vis Gabriel Marcel’s notion of creative fidelity and disponibilite. Scientia, 5(2), 17-39. http://scientia-sanbeda.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/vol-5.2-jj-aguas.pdf
  2. Andres, T. (1981). Understanding Filipino values: A management approach. New Day Publishers.
  3. Bulatao, J. (1992). Phenomena and their interpretation: Landmark essays 1957-1989. Ateneo de Manila.
  4. Bulloch, H. C. (2017). Ambivalent moralities of cooperation and corruption: Local explanations for (under) development on a Philippine island. The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 28(1), 56-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/taja.12173
  5. Cleofas, J. A. (2019). Towards a practical and empirically grounded account of útang-na-loób as a Filipino virtue. Kritika Kultura, 33, 157-179. https://archium.ateneo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=philo-faculty-pubs
  6. Dy, M. B. (Ed.). (1994). Values in Philippine culture and education: Philippine philosophical studies I. The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
  7. Enriquez, V.G. (1978). Kapwa: A core concept in Filipino social psychology. Philippine Social Sciences and Humanities Review, 42(1–4). https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814379021-005
  8. Enriquez, V.G. (1992). From colonial to liberation psychology. University of the Philippines Press.
  9. Fallows, J. (November, 1987). A damaged culture. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1987/11/a-damaged-culture/505178/
  10. Gorospe, V.R. (1994). Understanding the Filipino value system. In M.V. Dy (Ed.). Values in Philippine culture and education (pp. 63-70). The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy. http://crvp.org/publications/Series-III/III-7.pdf
  11. Jocano, F. L. (1992). Issues and challenges in Filipino value formation. Punlad Research House.
  12. Jocano, F. L. (1997). Filipino value system: A cultural definition. Punlad Research House.
  13. Kelsen, H. (1991). General theory of norms. Oxford University Press.
  14. Licuanan, P. (1994). A moral recovery program: Building a people—building a nation. In M.V. Dy (Ed.). Values in Philippine culture and education (pp.35-56). The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy. http://crvp.org/publications/Series-III/III-7.pdf
  15. Lynch, F. (1973). Social acceptance. In F. Lynch, & A. de Guzman (Eds.). Four readings on Philippine values (4th ed., pp. 1–68). Ateneo de Manila University Press.
  16. Miranda, D. M. (1992). Buting Pinoy: Probe essays on value as Filipino. Divine Word Publications.
  17. Mulder, N. (2013). Filipino identity: The haunting question. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 32(1), 55-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341303200103
  18. Peâ€Pua, R., & Protacioâ€Marcelino, E. A. (2000). Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino psychology): A legacy of Virgilio G. Enriquez. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(1), 49-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00054
  19. Quito, E.S. (1994). The ambivalence of Filipino traits and values. In M.V. Dy (Ed.). Values in Philippine
  20. culture and education (pp.35-56). The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy. http://crvp.org/publications/Series-III/III-7.pdf
  21. Reyes, J. (2015). Loób and kapwa: An introduction to a Filipino virtue ethics. Asian Philosophy, 25(2), 148-171. https://asset-pdf.scinapse.io/prod/2341864813/2341864813.pdf
  22. Tablan, F. (2021). Filipino virtue ethics and meaningful work. Humanities Bulletin, 4(1), 20–40. https://www.journals.lapub.co.uk/index.php/HB/article/view/1975

Similar Articles

11-20 of 63

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.