Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal

Articles

Vol. 13 No. 2Si (2025)

Herd Forecasting and Acceptance Analysis of Sustainable Meat Production through 3D-Bioprinted Meat from Fish Stem Cell

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj1302si.i2501
Submitted
December 13, 2025
Published
November 30, 2025
FULL PAPER

Keywords

  • 3D-bioprinted fish meat
  • consumption intention
  • long short-term memory
  • neural network
  • sustainable production and consumption

Abstract

Background: Sustainable production and consumption have been targeted in this study through the lens of 3D bioprinted fish meat using their stem cell. Adopting recent developments from Steakholder Foods Ltd., the cruelty-free and slaughter-free process has been seen as promising for future meat sources.
Methods: This study employed a consumption intention analysis to assess acceptance and forecast the general population using an integrated machine learning algorithm comprising a neural network and long short-term memory, implemented in MATLAB R2021a. Using an established integrated framework of the health belief model and values, beliefs, and norms theory, combined with the theory of planned behavior, the researcher employed a purposive sampling approach among 738 valid respondents.
Results: It was seen that self-efficacy, perception of environmental concern, perceived values, personal beliefs, ecological worldview, health beliefs, and norms affected the positive consumption intention.
Conclusion: It was implied that high positive pro-environmental impact and perceived value were dominant variables affecting the herd acceptance of 3D bioprinted fish meat. This further implicated the need for slaughter-free and cruelty-free alternative food sources. Further policy and implications on sustainable production and consumption were developed.

References

  1. Anders, S., Malzoni, M., & An, H. (2023). Altruism and anti-anthropocentrism shape individual choice intentions for pro-environmental and ethical meat credence attributes. PLOS One, 18(11), e0294531–e0294531. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294531
  2. Auyeskhan, U., Azhbagambetov, A., Sadykov, T., Dairabayeva, D., Talamona, D., & Chan, M.-Y. (2024). Reducing meat consumption in Central Asia through 3D printing of plant-based protein—enhanced alternatives—a mini review. Frontiers in Nutrition, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1308836
  3. Caulier, S., Doets, E., & Noort, M. (2020). An exploratory consumer study of 3D printed food perception in a real-life military setting. Food Quality and Preference, 86, 104001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104001
  4. Dutta, S. D., Ganguly, K., Jeong, M.-S., Patel, D. K., Patil, T. V., Cho, S.-J., & Lim, K.-T. (2022). Bioengineered lab-grown meat-like constructs through 3D bioprinting of antioxidative protein hydrolysates. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 14(30), 34513–34526. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c10620
  5. Engel, L., Vilhelmsen, K., Richter, I., Moritz, J., Ryynänen, T., Young, J. F., Burton, R. J. F., Kidmose, U., & Klöckner, C. A. (2024). Psychological factors influencing consumer intentions to consume cultured meat, fish and dairy. Appetite, 200, 107501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107501
  6. Farrow, K., Grolleau, G., & Ibanez, L. (2017). Social norms and pro-environmental behavior: A review of the evidence. Ecological Economics, 140, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.017
  7. German, J. D., Redi, A. A. N. P., Ong, A. K. S., Prasetyo, Y. T., & Sumera, V. L. M. (2022). Predicting factors affecting preparedness of volcanic eruption for a sustainable community: A case study in the Philippines. Sustainability, 14(18), 11329. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811329
  8. Godoi, F. C., Prakash, S., & Bhandari, B. (2015, December 21). Review of 3D printed and potential red meat applications | meat & livestock Australia. Meat and Livestock Australia. https://www.mla.comhttps//www.mla.com.au/contentassets/0336626468ca407393cd319ed5faf2eb/v.rmh.0034_final_report.pdf.au/research-and-development/reports/2016/review-of-3d-printed-and-potential-red-meat-applications/
  9. Hartmann, P., Eisend, M., Apaolaza, V., & D’Souza, C. (2017). Warm glow vs. altruistic values: How important is intrinsic emotional reward in proenvironmental behavior? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 52, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.05.006
  10. Jamshidi, M. B., Lalbakhsh, A., Talla, J., Peroutka, Z., Hadjilooei, F., Lalbakhsh, P., Jamshidi, M., Spada, L. L., Mirmozafari, M., Dehghani, M., Sabet, A., Roshani, S., Roshani, S., Bayat-Makou, N., Mohamadzade, B., Malek, Z., Jamshidi, A., Kiani, S., Hashemi-Dezaki, H., & Mohyuddin, W. (2020). Artificial intelligence and COVID-19: Deep learning approaches for diagnosis and treatment. IEEE Access, 8, 109581–109595. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3001973
  11. Lanz, M., Hartmann, C., Egan, P., & Siegrist, M. (2024). Consumer acceptance of cultured, plant-based, 3D-printed meat and fish alternatives. Future Foods, 9, 100297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100297
  12. Martin, K. S., Colantonio, A. G., Picho, K., & Boyle, K. E. (2016). Self-efficacy is associated with increased food security in novel food pantry program. SSM - Population Health, 2, 62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.01.005
  13. Mendoza, M. C. O., Chico, J. C. D., Ong, A. K. S., & Regayas, R. A. M. R. R. A. M. (2024). Assessment of health values, beliefs, norms, and behavior towards consumption intention of 3d-Bioprinted meat. Foods, 13(17), 2662–2662. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13172662
  14. Niu, R., Xin, Q., Xu, E., Yao, S., Chen, M., & Liu, D. (2024). Nanostarch-Stimulated cell adhesion in 3D bioprinted hydrogel scaffolds for cell cultured meat. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 16(18). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c03585
  15. Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2003). Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(4), 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(03)00037-9
  16. Ong, A. K. S., Arriola, R. S. L., Eneria, Z. M. R., Lopez, L. G., Matias, E. A. L., Diaz, J. F. T., German, J. D., & Gumasing, Ma. J. J. (2024). 3D bioprinted meat: The values-beliefs-norms evaluation of perceived future food source among younger generations. British Food Journal, 126(9), 3505–3528. https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-03-2024-0283
  17. Ong, A. K. S., Mendoza, M. C. O., Ponce, J. R. R., Bernardo, K. T. A., Tolentino, S. A. M., Diaz, J. F. T., & Young, M. N. (2024). Analysis of investment behavior among Filipinos: Integration of Social exchange theory (SET) and the Theory of planned behavior (TPB). Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 654(15), 130162–130162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2024.130162
  18. Öztürk, O. B., & Başar, E. (2022). Multiple linear regression analysis and artificial neural networks based decision support system for energy efficiency in shipping. Ocean Engineering, 243, 110209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110209
  19. Pakseresht, A., Kaliji, S. A., & Canavari, M. (2022). Review of factors affecting consumer acceptance of cultured meat. Appetite, 170, 105829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105829
  20. Panda, A., & Yamano, T. (2023). Asia’s transition to net zero: Opportunities and challenges in agriculture. (ADB Economics Working Paper Series No. 694). Asian Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.22617/wps230360-2
  21. Petrovic, Z., Djordjevic, V., Milicevic, D., Nastasijevic, I., & Parunovic, N. (2015). Meat production and consumption: Environmental consequences. Procedia Food Science, 5, 235–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2015.09.041
  22. Portanguen, S., Tournayre, P., Sicard, J., Astruc, T., & Mirade, P.-S. (2019). Toward the design of functional foods and biobased products by 3D printing: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 86, 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.023
  23. Rubio, N., Datar, I., Stachura, D., & Krueger, K. (2018, November 14). Cell-Based fish: A novel approach to seafood production and an opportunity for cellular agriculture. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201811.0326.v1
  24. Sadigov, R. (2022). Rapid growth of the world population and its socioeconomic results. The Scientific World Journal, 2022, 8110229, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8110229
  25. Steakholder Foods. (2023, April 30). Israeli firm “steakholder” finally produces world’s first 3D-printed fish fillets. https://steakholderfoods.com/israeli-firm-steakholder-finally-produces-worlds-first-3d-printed-fish-fillets/
  26. Steakholder Foods Ltd. (2023, May 25). Steakholder foods® unveils 3D bio-printing business model. PR Newswire. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/steakholder-foods-unveils-3d-bio-printing-business-model-301834537.html
  27. Suchyta, M. (2021). Environmental values and Americans’ beliefs about farm animal well-being. Agriculture and Human Values, 38, 987–1001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10206-0
  28. Tibrewal, K., Dandekar, P., & Jain, R. (2023). Extrusion-based sustainable 3D bioprinting of meat & its analogues: A review. Bioprinting, 29, e00256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2022.e00256
  29. Wilks, M., & Phillips, C. J. C. (2017). Attitudes to in vitro meat: A survey of potential consumers in the United States. PLOS One, 12(2), e0171904. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171904
  30. Wittenberg, I., Blöbaum, A., & Matthies, E. (2018). Environmental motivations for energy use in PV households: Proposal of a modified norm activation model for the specific context of PV households. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 55, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.01.002
  31. Zhu, W., Zhang, Q., & Wang, F. (2024). Factors affecting the consumption intention of game meats: Integrating theory of planned behavior and norm activation model. Biological Conservation, 292, 110544–110544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110544

Similar Articles

11-20 of 63

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)