The Properties of Interlocking Directorates in the Philippines: An Exploratory Analysis

Keywords: Board interlock, interlocking directorate, network analysis, Philippines, centrality


Governance has become an increasingly important factor in the investment decisions of firms and investors. Thus, it is important to determine the quality and composition of corporate boards, which are vital overseers who act in the best interests of shareholders to improve and strengthen them. While interlocking directorates are not a recent occurrence in the Philippines, updated literature on the structure of the country’s board interlock network is sparse. Thus, this study provides a baseline snapshot by analyzing all 251 publicly-listed companies on the Philippine Stock Exchange at the director and board levels. More so, the study utilizes social network analysis tools to describe the properties of interlocking directorates and visually maps out the social network that underpins these relationships. It reveals that the board network is extensive, with almost 90% of firms connected, thanks to a handful of key directors who have high degrees of connectivity.


Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010).
The role of boards of directors in corporate
governance: A conceptual framework and
survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 58–107.

Anthonisse, J. M. (1971). The rush in a directed graph.
Journal of Computational Physics, 1–10.

Au, K., Peng, M. W., & Wang, D. (2000). Interlocking
directorates, firm strategies, and performance
in Hong Kong: Towards a research agenda. Asia
Pacific Journal of Management, 17(1), 29–47.

Banderlipe, M. R. S. II (2009). The impact of selected
corporate governance variables in mitigating
earnings management in the Philippines.
DLSU Business & Economics Review, 19(1), 17–27.

Banderlipe, M. R. S. II (2012). Board characteristics
and its impact on share prices of publicly-listed
holding companies in the Philippines. Academy
of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 16(4), 25.

Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (2021). Amendments
to corporate governance guidelines for BSPsupervised
financial institutions [BSP Circular No. 1129, series of 2021].

Battiston, S., & Catanzaro, M. (2004). Statistical
properties of corporate board and director networks.
The European Physical Journal B 38(2), 345–352.

Battiston, S., Weisbuch, G., & Bonabeau, E. (2003).
Spread of decisions in the corporate board network.
Advances in Complex Systems, 6(4), 631–644.

Bernow, S., & Nuttall, R. (2020, May 26). Why ESG is
here to stay. McKinsey & Company.

Bianco, M., & Pagnoni, E. (1997). Interlocking directorates
across listed companies in Italy: The case of banks. BNL
Quarterly Revie, (Special Issue), 203–227.

Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of
measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5),

Braam, G., & Borghans, L. (2009). Balanced scorecard
diffusion from a social network perspective: The
effects of interlocking directorates on the use of
balanced scorecard practices (NiCE Working Paper
09–106). Nijmegen Center for Economics (NiCE),
Institute for Management Research, Radbound University,

Cárdenas, J. (2016). Why do corporate elites form
cohesive networks in some countries, and
do not in others? Cross-national analysis of
corporate elite networks in Latin America.
International Sociology, 31(3), 341–363.

Carroll, W. K., & Sapinski, J. P. (2011). Corporate
elites and intercorporate networks. In P. J.
Carrington & J. Scott (Eds.), The SAGE handbook
of social network analysis (pp. 180–195).
SAGE Publications.

CFA Institute (2021). Introduction to corporate
governance and other ESG considerations.

Chen, J. (2021, July 4). Corporate governance.Investopedia.

Chu, J. S. G., & Davis, G. F. (2016). Who killed the
inner circle? The decline of the American
corporate interlock network. American
Journal of Sociology, 122(3), 714–754.

Commerce and Trade, 15 U.S.C. §19 (1925).

Conmy, S. (2021, August 30). What is a board of
directors? The Corporate Governance Institute.

Conyon, M. J., & Muldoon, M. R. (2006). The small world
of corporate boards. Journal of Business Finance
& Accounting, 33(9–10), 1321–1343.

Cudia, C. P. & Dela Cruz, A. L. C. (2018).
Determinants of earnings management
choice among publicly listed industrial firms
in the Philippines. DLSU Business & Economics
Review, 27(2), 119–129.

Dal Vesco, D. G., & Beuren, I. M. (2016). Do the
board of directors composition and the board
interlocking influence on performance?
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, 13(2).

Davis, G. F., Yoo, M., & Baker, W. E. (2003). The small
world of the American corporate elite, 1982-
2001. Strategic Organization, 1(3), 301–326.

de Vera, B. O. (2022, February 16). Cash remittances
to PH hit new high of $31.4B in 2021.

Descalzo, A., Cabaccan, S., Dob, J., Fermante, R.,
Reyes, C., Simangan, A., & Tuzon, J. (2017). Correlation
between the presence of accountants in the board of
directors and discretionary accruals: The case of Philippines.
Global Review of Accounting and Finance, 8(1), 84–94.

Doherty, J. F. (1979). A preliminary study of interlocking
directorates among financial, commercial,
manufacturing and service enterprises in
the Philippines. Philippine eLib Project.

Dooley, P. C. (1969). The interlocking directorate.
The American Economic Review, 59(3), 314–323.

Drago, C., Manestra, S., & Santella, P. (2011).
Interlocking directorships and cross-shareholdings
among the Italian blue chips. European Business
Organization Law Review, 12, 619–652.

Drees, J. M., & Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. (2013).
Synthesizing and extending resource
dependence theory: A meta-analysis.
Journal of Management, 39(6), 1666–1698.

Durbach, I. N., & Parker, H. (2009). An analysis of
corporate board networks in South Africa. South
African Journal of Business Management, 40(2), 15–26.

Etheridge, D. R. (2012, April 11-13). Boards of a
feather flock together: Board networks among
ASX firms [Conference session]. Financial
Markets & Corporate Governance Conference,
Melbourne, Australia.

Etzion, D., & Davis, G. F. (2008). Revolving doors?
A network analysis of corporate officers
and U.S. government officials. Journal of
Management Inquiry, 17(3), 157–161.

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of Ownership
and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, XXVI.

Farwis, M., & Nazar, M. C. A. (2019). Interlocking
directorate and firm performance of listed
companies in Sri Lanka. Asian Journal of
Research in Banking and Finance, 9(3), 1.

Fattobene, L., Caiffa, M., & Di Carlo, E. (2018).
Interlocking directorship across Italian listed
companies: Evidence from a natural experiment.
Journal of Management and Governance, 22(2), 393–425.

Ferrer, R. C. & Banderlipe, M. R. S. II (2012). The
Influence of Corporate Board Characteristics on
Firm Performance of Publicly Listed Property
Companies in the Philippines. Academy of Accounting
and Financial Studies Journal, 16(4), 22. Retrieved from

Fligstein, N., & Brantley, P. (1992). Bank control,
owner control, or organizational dynamics:
Who controls the large modern corporation?
American Journal of Sociology, 98(2), 280–307.

Freeman, L. C. (2004). The development of social
network analysis: A study in the sociology of
science. Empirical Press.

Hage, P., & Harary, F. (1995). Eccentricity and centrality
in networks. Social Networks, 17(1), 57–63.

Hallock, K. F. (1997). Reciprocally interlocking boards
of directors and executive compensation. The
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,
32(3), 331.

Hamdan, A. (2018). Board interlocking and firm
performance: The role of foreign ownership
in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of
Managerial Finance, 14(3), 266–281.

Heemskerk, E. M. (2013). The rise of the European
corporate elite: Evidence from the network
of interlocking directorates in 2005 and 2010.
Economy and Society, 42(1), 74–101.

Hernández-Lara, A. B., & Gonzales-Bustos, J. P. (2019).
The impact of interlocking directorates on
innovation: The effects of business and social
ties. Management Decision, 57(10), 2799–2815.

Jamaludin, M. F., & Hashim, F. (2018). Corporate
governance, institutional characteristics,
and director networks in Malaysia. Asian
Academy of Management Journal of
Accounting and Finance, 13(2), 135–154.

Jeidels, O. (1905). Das verhaltnis der deutschen
grossbanken zur industrie mit besonderer
berucksichtigung der eisenindustrie:
Abschnitt II: Die entwicklung der grossbanken.
[Doctoral dissertation, Friedrich Wilhelms University, Berlin].

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory
of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency
costs and ownership structure. Journal of
Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

Kaczmarek, S., Kimino, S., & Pye, A. (2014).
Interlocking directorships and firm
performance in highly regulated sectors: The
moderating impact of board diversity. Journal
of Management & Governance, 18(2), 347–372.

Karim, K. E., Li, J., Lin, K. J., & Robin, A. (2021). Do
directors have style? Board interlock and
accounting properties. Journal of Business
Finance & Accounting, 49(1–2), 3–32.

Kerber, R., & Jessop, S. (2021, December 23).
Analysis: How 2021 became the year of ESG
investing. Reuters.

Kim, Y.-H., & Kim, Y.-M. (2008). Changing faces of network
capitalism in Korea: A case of corporate board of directors’
network. Korean Journal of Sociology, 42(8), 38–58.

Lamb, N. H. (2017). Does the number of interlocking directors
influence a firm’s financial performance? An exploratory
meta-analysis. American Journal of Management, 7(2), 47–57.

Lee, Z.-R., & Velema, T. A. (2014). Between state
power and familism: The interlock network in
Taiwan throughout the twentieth century. In
T. David & G. Westerhuls (Eds.), The power of
corporate networks (1st edition, pp. 276–295).

Maslov, S., & Sneppen, K. (2002). Specificity and stability
in topology of protein networks. Science, 296(5569),

Meeusen, W., & Cuyvers, L. (1985). The interaction
between interlocking directorships and the
economic behaviour of companies. In F. N.
Stokman, R. Ziegler, & J. Scott (Eds.), Networks
of corporate power (pp. 45–72). B. Blackwell.

Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis,
critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates.
Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 271–298.

Murray, G. (2001). Interlocking directorates:
What do they tell about corporate power in Australia?
Journal of Australian Political Economy, 47, 5–26.

Nelson, G. (2022, May 28). The big differentiator:
Why ESG reporting is an opportunity for success.

Ong, C. H., Wan, D., & Ong, K.-S. (2003). An exploratory
study on interlocking directorates in listed firms in
Singapore. Corporate Governance, 11(4). 322–334.

Pertiwi, M. B., & Yulianto, A. (2020). Board interlocking
and firm performance: Evidence from Indonesia.
Management Analysis Journal, 9(1), 26–34.

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external
control of organizations: A resource dependence
perspective. Stanford University Press.

Philippines. Securities and Exchange Commission
(2019). Code of corporate governance for
public companies and registered issuers [SEC
Memorandum Circular No. 24, Series of 2019].

Proctor, C. H., & Loomis, C. P. (1951). Analysis of
sociometric data. In M. Jahoda, M. Deutsch,
& S. W. Cook (Eds.), Research methods in social
relations (pp. 561–568). Dryden Press.

Raquiza, A. R. (2014). Changing configuration
of Philippine capitalism. Philippine Political
Science Journal, 35(2), 225–250.

Revised Corporation Code of the Philippines,
Seventeenth Congress, 3rd Regular Session

Romano, M., & Favino, C. (2013). Board composition
and interlocking directorate evolution as a
consequence of the recent financial crisis:
Evidence from Italian listed companies.
Corporate Ownership and Control, 11(1), 175–

Rommens, A., Cuyvers, L., & Deloof, M. (2007).
Interlocking directorates and business groups:
Belgian evidence. https://www.researchgate.

Roudaki, J., & Bhuiyan, Md. B. U. (2015). Interlocking
directorship in New Zealand. Australasian
Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 9(3),

Rowles, D. (2021, October 7). Governance – the most
important ESG factor? Hargreaves & Lansdown.

Saavedra, S., Gilarranz, L. J., Rohr, R. P., Schnabel,
M., Uzzi, B., & Bascompte, J. (2014). Stock fluctuations
are correlated and amplified across networks of
interlocking directorates. EPJ Data Science, 3(1), 30.

Sabidussi, G. (1966). The centrality index of a graph.
Psychometrika, 31(4), 581–603.

Salvaj, E., Ferraro, F., & Tàpies, J. (2008). Family firms
and the contingent value of board interlocks: The Spanish
case. In J. Tàpies & J. L. Ward (Eds.), Family values and value
creation (pp. 236–259). Palgrave Macmillan.

Samarbakhsh, L., & Tasic, B. (2020). What makes a
board director better connected? Evidence
from graph theory. Computer Science and
Information Systems, 17(2), 357–377.

Santos, R. L., da Silveira, A. di M., & Barros, L. A.
(2012). Board interlocking in Brazil: Directors’
participation in multiple companies and its
effect on firm value and profitability. Latin
American Business Review, 13(1), 1–28.

Senekal, B. A., & Stemmet, K. (2014). The South African
banking director network: An investigation
into interlocking directorships using social
network analysis (SNA). International Business
& Economics Research Journal 13(5), 963–980.

Senekal, B. A., & Stemmet, K. (2019). A weighted
director network analysis of the big four banks
on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. South
African Journal of Business Management, 50(1).

Shaw, T. S., Cordeiro, J. J., & Saravanan, P. (2016).
Director network resources and firm performance:
Evidence from Indian corporate governance reforms.
Asian Business & Management, 15(3), 165–200.

Shropshire, C. (2010). The role of the interlocking
director and board receptivity in the diffusion of practices.
Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 246–264.

Soref, M., & Zeitlin, M. (1988). Finance capital and
the internal structure of the capitalist class in the
United States. In M. S. Mizruchi & M. Schwartz (Eds.),
Intercorporate relations: The structural analysis of
business. Cambridge University Press.

Stokman, F. N., Ziegler, R., & Scott, J. (Eds.). (1985).
Networks of corporate power: A comparative
analysis of ten countries. Polity Press.

Tan, E. A. (1993). Interlocking directorates, commercial banks,
other financial institutions and non-financial corporations.
Philippine Review of Economics, 30(1), 1–50.

Tan, M., Lee, C. K., Chan, W. C., Koh, S. H., & Sugihardjo,
S. (2009). A study of interlocking directorships among
mainland Chinese companies listed on the SGX.
Corporate Ownership and Control, 6(4), 210–217.

Tang, K. (2019, March 22). Exploring the G in ESG:
Governance in greater detail – Part I. S&P Global.

Tang, Y., Li, M., Wang, J., Pan, Y., & Wu, F.-X. (2015).
CytoNCA: A cytoscape plugin for centrality
analysis and evaluation of protein interaction
networks. Biosystems, 127, 67–72.

Valmonte, K. C. G. (2022, January 3). BPOs seen
to drive office space demand. BusinessWorld Online.

Watkins-Fassler, K., Fernandez-Pérez, V., & Rodriguez-
Ariza, L. (2016). President interlocking, family
firms and firm performance during turbulent
times: Evidence from Latin America. European
Journal of Family Business, 6(2), 63–74.

Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics
of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393, 440–442.

Wolinsky, J. (2022, March 28). ESG is the third wave
of change in asset management after Graham
and MPT. Forbes.

Xie, Z., Lin, R., Wang, J., Hu, W., & Miao, L. (2020).
Vicarious learning: How entrepreneurs
enhance a firm’s international competitiveness
through learning from interlocking director
network partners. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 689.

yWorks (n.d.). yFiles for Java 2.13 developer’s guide:
Automatic graph layout: Organic layout style.

Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and
corporate financial performance: A review and integrative
model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291–334.

Zona, F., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Withers, M.
C. (2018). Board interlocks and firm
performance: Toward a combined agency–
resource dependence perspective.
Journal of Management, 44(2), 589–618.
How to Cite
YuS. (2022). The Properties of Interlocking Directorates in the Philippines: An Exploratory Analysis. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 10(1).