The Properties of Interlocking Directorates in the Philippines: An Exploratory Analysis

Keywords: Board interlock, interlocking directorate, network analysis, Philippines, centrality

Abstract

Governance has become an increasingly important factor in the investment decisions of firms and investors. Thus, it is important to determine the quality and composition of corporate boards, which are vital overseers who act in the best interests of shareholders to improve and strengthen them. While interlocking directorates are not a recent occurrence in the Philippines, updated literature on the structure of the country’s board interlock network is sparse. Thus, this study provides a baseline snapshot by analyzing all 251 publicly-listed companies on the Philippine Stock Exchange at the director and board levels. More so, the study utilizes social network analysis tools to describe the properties of interlocking directorates and visually maps out the social network that underpins these relationships. It reveals that the board network is extensive, with almost 90% of firms connected, thanks to a handful of key directors who have high degrees of connectivity.

References

Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010).
The role of boards of directors in corporate
governance: A conceptual framework and
survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 58–107.
https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.1.58

Anthonisse, J. M. (1971). The rush in a directed graph.
Journal of Computational Physics, 1–10.
https://www.scinapse.io/papers/1513185775

Au, K., Peng, M. W., & Wang, D. (2000). Interlocking
directorates, firm strategies, and performance
in Hong Kong: Towards a research agenda. Asia
Pacific Journal of Management, 17(1), 29–47.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015432819596

Banderlipe, M. R. S. II (2009). The impact of selected
corporate governance variables in mitigating
earnings management in the Philippines.
DLSU Business & Economics Review, 19(1), 17–27.
https://doi.org/10.3860/ber.v19i1.1110

Banderlipe, M. R. S. II (2012). Board characteristics
and its impact on share prices of publicly-listed
holding companies in the Philippines. Academy
of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 16(4), 25.

Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (2021). Amendments
to corporate governance guidelines for BSPsupervised
financial institutions [BSP Circular No. 1129, series of 2021].
https://www.bsp.gov.ph/Regulations/Issuances/2021/1129.pdf

Battiston, S., & Catanzaro, M. (2004). Statistical
properties of corporate board and director networks.
The European Physical Journal B 38(2), 345–352.
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2004-00127-8

Battiston, S., Weisbuch, G., & Bonabeau, E. (2003).
Spread of decisions in the corporate board network.
Advances in Complex Systems, 6(4), 631–644.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525903001109

Bernow, S., & Nuttall, R. (2020, May 26). Why ESG is
here to stay. McKinsey & Company.
https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-
corporate-finance/our-insights/why-esg-is-here-to-stay

Bianco, M., & Pagnoni, E. (1997). Interlocking directorates
across listed companies in Italy: The case of banks. BNL
Quarterly Revie, (Special Issue), 203–227.

Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of
measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5),
1170–1182. https://doi.org/10.1086/228631

Braam, G., & Borghans, L. (2009). Balanced scorecard
diffusion from a social network perspective: The
effects of interlocking directorates on the use of
balanced scorecard practices (NiCE Working Paper
09–106). Nijmegen Center for Economics (NiCE),
Institute for Management Research, Radbound University,
Nijmegen. https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/handle/2066/74898

Cárdenas, J. (2016). Why do corporate elites form
cohesive networks in some countries, and
do not in others? Cross-national analysis of
corporate elite networks in Latin America.
International Sociology, 31(3), 341–363.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580916629965

Carroll, W. K., & Sapinski, J. P. (2011). Corporate
elites and intercorporate networks. In P. J.
Carrington & J. Scott (Eds.), The SAGE handbook
of social network analysis (pp. 180–195).
SAGE Publications.

CFA Institute (2021). Introduction to corporate
governance and other ESG considerations.
https://www.cfainstitute.org/membership/
professional-development/refresher-readings/
introduction-corporate-governance-esg-considerations

Chen, J. (2021, July 4). Corporate governance.Investopedia.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/corporategovernance.asp

Chu, J. S. G., & Davis, G. F. (2016). Who killed the
inner circle? The decline of the American
corporate interlock network. American
Journal of Sociology, 122(3), 714–754.
https://doi.org/10.1086/688650

Commerce and Trade, 15 U.S.C. §19 (1925).
https://www.loc.gov/item/uscode1925-001015001/

Conmy, S. (2021, August 30). What is a board of
directors? The Corporate Governance Institute.
https://www.thecorporategovernanceinstitute.com/
insights/lexicon/what-is-a-board-of-directors/

Conyon, M. J., & Muldoon, M. R. (2006). The small world
of corporate boards. Journal of Business Finance
& Accounting, 33(9–10), 1321–1343.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00634.x

Cudia, C. P. & Dela Cruz, A. L. C. (2018).
Determinants of earnings management
choice among publicly listed industrial firms
in the Philippines. DLSU Business & Economics
Review, 27(2), 119–129. https://dlsuber.com/
wp-content/uploads/2018/9cudia-011918.pdf

Dal Vesco, D. G., & Beuren, I. M. (2016). Do the
board of directors composition and the board
interlocking influence on performance?
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, 13(2).
https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2016160007

Davis, G. F., Yoo, M., & Baker, W. E. (2003). The small
world of the American corporate elite, 1982-
2001. Strategic Organization, 1(3), 301–326.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270030013002

de Vera, B. O. (2022, February 16). Cash remittances
to PH hit new high of $31.4B in 2021. INQUIRER.net.
https://business.inquirer.net/341015/cashremittances-
to-ph-hit-new-high-of-31-4bin-2021

Descalzo, A., Cabaccan, S., Dob, J., Fermante, R.,
Reyes, C., Simangan, A., & Tuzon, J. (2017). Correlation
between the presence of accountants in the board of
directors and discretionary accruals: The case of Philippines.
Global Review of Accounting and Finance, 8(1), 84–94.
https://doi.org/10.21102/graf.2017.03.81.07

Doherty, J. F. (1979). A preliminary study of interlocking
directorates among financial, commercial,
manufacturing and service enterprises in
the Philippines. Philippine eLib Project.
https://www.elib.gov.ph/details.php?uid=ac7c07fd62a
a350fa6f825d6963bf6bc&tab=2

Dooley, P. C. (1969). The interlocking directorate.
The American Economic Review, 59(3), 314–323.

Drago, C., Manestra, S., & Santella, P. (2011).
Interlocking directorships and cross-shareholdings
among the Italian blue chips. European Business
Organization Law Review, 12, 619–652.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1799168

Drees, J. M., & Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. (2013).
Synthesizing and extending resource
dependence theory: A meta-analysis.
Journal of Management, 39(6), 1666–1698.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312471391

Durbach, I. N., & Parker, H. (2009). An analysis of
corporate board networks in South Africa. South
African Journal of Business Management, 40(2), 15–26.
https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v40i2.537

Etheridge, D. R. (2012, April 11-13). Boards of a
feather flock together: Board networks among
ASX firms [Conference session]. Financial
Markets & Corporate Governance Conference,
Melbourne, Australia. https://www.latrobe.
edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/1214519/
FMCG2012_Program.pdf

Etzion, D., & Davis, G. F. (2008). Revolving doors?
A network analysis of corporate officers
and U.S. government officials. Journal of
Management Inquiry, 17(3), 157–161.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492608316918

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of Ownership
and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, XXVI.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.94034

Farwis, M., & Nazar, M. C. A. (2019). Interlocking
directorate and firm performance of listed
companies in Sri Lanka. Asian Journal of
Research in Banking and Finance, 9(3), 1.
https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7323.2019.00003.8

Fattobene, L., Caiffa, M., & Di Carlo, E. (2018).
Interlocking directorship across Italian listed
companies: Evidence from a natural experiment.
Journal of Management and Governance, 22(2), 393–425.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-017-9392-6

Ferrer, R. C. & Banderlipe, M. R. S. II (2012). The
Influence of Corporate Board Characteristics on
Firm Performance of Publicly Listed Property
Companies in the Philippines. Academy of Accounting
and Financial Studies Journal, 16(4), 22. Retrieved from
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/2351

Fligstein, N., & Brantley, P. (1992). Bank control,
owner control, or organizational dynamics:
Who controls the large modern corporation?
American Journal of Sociology, 98(2), 280–307.
https://doi.org/10.1086/230009

Freeman, L. C. (2004). The development of social
network analysis: A study in the sociology of
science. Empirical Press.

Hage, P., & Harary, F. (1995). Eccentricity and centrality
in networks. Social Networks, 17(1), 57–63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(94)00248-9

Hallock, K. F. (1997). Reciprocally interlocking boards
of directors and executive compensation. The
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,
32(3), 331. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331203

Hamdan, A. (2018). Board interlocking and firm
performance: The role of foreign ownership
in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of
Managerial Finance, 14(3), 266–281.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-09-2017-0192

Heemskerk, E. M. (2013). The rise of the European
corporate elite: Evidence from the network
of interlocking directorates in 2005 and 2010.
Economy and Society, 42(1), 74–101.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2012.686720

Hernández-Lara, A. B., & Gonzales-Bustos, J. P. (2019).
The impact of interlocking directorates on
innovation: The effects of business and social
ties. Management Decision, 57(10), 2799–2815.
https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2017-1186

Jamaludin, M. F., & Hashim, F. (2018). Corporate
governance, institutional characteristics,
and director networks in Malaysia. Asian
Academy of Management Journal of
Accounting and Finance, 13(2), 135–154.
https://doi.org/10.21315/aamjaf2017.13.2.7

Jeidels, O. (1905). Das verhaltnis der deutschen
grossbanken zur industrie mit besonderer
berucksichtigung der eisenindustrie:
Abschnitt II: Die entwicklung der grossbanken.
[Doctoral dissertation, Friedrich Wilhelms University, Berlin].
https://books.google.com/books?id=vwQVAQAAIAAJ

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory
of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency
costs and ownership structure. Journal of
Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Kaczmarek, S., Kimino, S., & Pye, A. (2014).
Interlocking directorships and firm
performance in highly regulated sectors: The
moderating impact of board diversity. Journal
of Management & Governance, 18(2), 347–372.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-012-9228-3

Karim, K. E., Li, J., Lin, K. J., & Robin, A. (2021). Do
directors have style? Board interlock and
accounting properties. Journal of Business
Finance & Accounting, 49(1–2), 3–32.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12567

Kerber, R., & Jessop, S. (2021, December 23).
Analysis: How 2021 became the year of ESG
investing. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/markets/
us/how-2021-became-year-esg-investing-2021-12-23/

Kim, Y.-H., & Kim, Y.-M. (2008). Changing faces of network
capitalism in Korea: A case of corporate board of directors’
network. Korean Journal of Sociology, 42(8), 38–58.
http://m.ksa21.or.kr/kjs/issues/files/03YH%20Kim_YM%20Kim.pdf

Lamb, N. H. (2017). Does the number of interlocking directors
influence a firm’s financial performance? An exploratory
meta-analysis. American Journal of Management, 7(2), 47–57.
http://t.www.na-businesspress.com/AJM/LambN_Web17_2_.pdf

Lee, Z.-R., & Velema, T. A. (2014). Between state
power and familism: The interlock network in
Taiwan throughout the twentieth century. In
T. David & G. Westerhuls (Eds.), The power of
corporate networks (1st edition, pp. 276–295).
Routledge.

Maslov, S., & Sneppen, K. (2002). Specificity and stability
in topology of protein networks. Science, 296(5569),
910–913. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1065103

Meeusen, W., & Cuyvers, L. (1985). The interaction
between interlocking directorships and the
economic behaviour of companies. In F. N.
Stokman, R. Ziegler, & J. Scott (Eds.), Networks
of corporate power (pp. 45–72). B. Blackwell.

Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis,
critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates.
Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 271–298.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.271

Murray, G. (2001). Interlocking directorates:
What do they tell about corporate power in Australia?
Journal of Australian Political Economy, 47, 5–26.
https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/handle/10072/3755

Nelson, G. (2022, May 28). The big differentiator:
Why ESG reporting is an opportunity for success.
Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesb
usinessdevelopmentcouncil/2022/03/28/the-big-
differentiator-why-esg-reporting-is-an-opportunity-
for-success/

Ong, C. H., Wan, D., & Ong, K.-S. (2003). An exploratory
study on interlocking directorates in listed firms in
Singapore. Corporate Governance, 11(4). 322–334.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00330

Pertiwi, M. B., & Yulianto, A. (2020). Board interlocking
and firm performance: Evidence from Indonesia.
Management Analysis Journal, 9(1), 26–34.
https://doi.org/10.15294/maj.v9i1.34585

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external
control of organizations: A resource dependence
perspective. Stanford University Press.

Philippines. Securities and Exchange Commission
(2019). Code of corporate governance for
public companies and registered issuers [SEC
Memorandum Circular No. 24, Series of 2019].
https://www.sec.gov.ph/mc-2019/mc-no-24-
s-2019-code-of-corporate-governance-for-public-
companies-and-registered-issuers/

Proctor, C. H., & Loomis, C. P. (1951). Analysis of
sociometric data. In M. Jahoda, M. Deutsch,
& S. W. Cook (Eds.), Research methods in social
relations (pp. 561–568). Dryden Press.

Raquiza, A. R. (2014). Changing configuration
of Philippine capitalism. Philippine Political
Science Journal, 35(2), 225–250.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01154451.2014.969799

Revised Corporation Code of the Philippines,
Seventeenth Congress, 3rd Regular Session
(2018). https://www.sec.gov.ph/wp-content/
uploads/2019/11/2019Legislation_RA-11232-
REVISED-CORPORATION-CODE-2019.pdf

Romano, M., & Favino, C. (2013). Board composition
and interlocking directorate evolution as a
consequence of the recent financial crisis:
Evidence from Italian listed companies.
Corporate Ownership and Control, 11(1), 175–
192. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i1c1art5

Rommens, A., Cuyvers, L., & Deloof, M. (2007).
Interlocking directorates and business groups:
Belgian evidence. https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/4904213_Interlocking_
Directorates_and_Business_Groups_Belgian_
Evidence

Roudaki, J., & Bhuiyan, Md. B. U. (2015). Interlocking
directorship in New Zealand. Australasian
Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 9(3),
45–58. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v9i3.4

Rowles, D. (2021, October 7). Governance – the most
important ESG factor? Hargreaves & Lansdown.
https://www.hl.co.uk/news/articles/
governance-the-most-important-esg-factor

Saavedra, S., Gilarranz, L. J., Rohr, R. P., Schnabel,
M., Uzzi, B., & Bascompte, J. (2014). Stock fluctuations
are correlated and amplified across networks of
interlocking directorates. EPJ Data Science, 3(1), 30.
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-014-0030-0

Sabidussi, G. (1966). The centrality index of a graph.
Psychometrika, 31(4), 581–603.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289527

Salvaj, E., Ferraro, F., & Tàpies, J. (2008). Family firms
and the contingent value of board interlocks: The Spanish
case. In J. Tàpies & J. L. Ward (Eds.), Family values and value
creation (pp. 236–259). Palgrave Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594227_12

Samarbakhsh, L., & Tasic, B. (2020). What makes a
board director better connected? Evidence
from graph theory. Computer Science and
Information Systems, 17(2), 357–377.
https://doi.org/10.2298/CSIS190628045S

Santos, R. L., da Silveira, A. di M., & Barros, L. A.
(2012). Board interlocking in Brazil: Directors’
participation in multiple companies and its
effect on firm value and profitability. Latin
American Business Review, 13(1), 1–28.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10978526.2012.673419

Senekal, B. A., & Stemmet, K. (2014). The South African
banking director network: An investigation
into interlocking directorships using social
network analysis (SNA). International Business
& Economics Research Journal 13(5), 963–980.
https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v13i5.8765

Senekal, B. A., & Stemmet, K. (2019). A weighted
director network analysis of the big four banks
on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. South
African Journal of Business Management, 50(1).
https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v50i1.386

Shaw, T. S., Cordeiro, J. J., & Saravanan, P. (2016).
Director network resources and firm performance:
Evidence from Indian corporate governance reforms.
Asian Business & Management, 15(3), 165–200.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-016-0003-1

Shropshire, C. (2010). The role of the interlocking
director and board receptivity in the diffusion of practices.
Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 246–264.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.2.zok246

Soref, M., & Zeitlin, M. (1988). Finance capital and
the internal structure of the capitalist class in the
United States. In M. S. Mizruchi & M. Schwartz (Eds.),
Intercorporate relations: The structural analysis of
business. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570841

Stokman, F. N., Ziegler, R., & Scott, J. (Eds.). (1985).
Networks of corporate power: A comparative
analysis of ten countries. Polity Press.

Tan, E. A. (1993). Interlocking directorates, commercial banks,
other financial institutions and non-financial corporations.
Philippine Review of Economics, 30(1), 1–50.
https://pre.econ.upd.edu.ph/index.php/pre/article/view/136/461

Tan, M., Lee, C. K., Chan, W. C., Koh, S. H., & Sugihardjo,
S. (2009). A study of interlocking directorships among
mainland Chinese companies listed on the SGX.
Corporate Ownership and Control, 6(4), 210–217.
https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv6i4c1p5

Tang, K. (2019, March 22). Exploring the G in ESG:
Governance in greater detail – Part I. S&P Global.
https://www.spglobal.com/en/research-insights/
articles/exploring-the-g-in-esg-governance-
in-greater-detail-part-i

Tang, Y., Li, M., Wang, J., Pan, Y., & Wu, F.-X. (2015).
CytoNCA: A cytoscape plugin for centrality
analysis and evaluation of protein interaction
networks. Biosystems, 127, 67–72.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2014.11.005

Valmonte, K. C. G. (2022, January 3). BPOs seen
to drive office space demand. BusinessWorld Online.
https://www.bworldonline.com/property/2022/01/04/
421425/bpos-seen-to-drive-office-space-demand-2/

Watkins-Fassler, K., Fernandez-Pérez, V., & Rodriguez-
Ariza, L. (2016). President interlocking, family
firms and firm performance during turbulent
times: Evidence from Latin America. European
Journal of Family Business, 6(2), 63–74.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfb.2016.12.001

Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics
of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393, 440–442.
https://www.nature.com/articles/30918

Wolinsky, J. (2022, March 28). ESG is the third wave
of change in asset management after Graham
and MPT. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jacobwolinsky/
2022/03/28/esg-is-the-third-wave-of-change-in-asset-
management-after-graham-and-mpt/?sh=b70a1e51604b

Xie, Z., Lin, R., Wang, J., Hu, W., & Miao, L. (2020).
Vicarious learning: How entrepreneurs
enhance a firm’s international competitiveness
through learning from interlocking director
network partners. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 689.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00689

yWorks (n.d.). yFiles for Java 2.13 developer’s guide:
Automatic graph layout: Organic layout style.
https://docs.yworks.com/yfiles/doc/developersguide/
smart_organic_layouter.html

Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and
corporate financial performance: A review and integrative
model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291–334.
https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500208

Zona, F., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Withers, M.
C. (2018). Board interlocks and firm
performance: Toward a combined agency–
resource dependence perspective.
Journal of Management, 44(2), 589–618.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315579512
Published
2022-06-08
How to Cite
YuS. (2022). The Properties of Interlocking Directorates in the Philippines: An Exploratory Analysis. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 10(1), 77-99. https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj2210.01.06
Section
Articles