Multidimensional Poverty Indicators in light of ASEAN Integration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj1503.01.01Keywords:
Poverty, ASEAN, ASEAN IntegrationAbstract
This study aimed to explore poverty among ASEAN member nations by introducing a multidimensional poverty index that can be used to determine the relative success of a country in deterring several deprivations that are identified and measured. It utilized multiple factors that can be useful for policy and investment decisions and are intended to complement analyses using financial poverty indicators. Using exploratory data analysis, several indicators were selected to represent the different dimensions of poverty. Said indicators were then subjected to factor analysis which yielded four multidimensional indices namely: General Welfare Index, Governance and Emotional Landscape Index, and Social Climate Index. Singapore, Brunei, and Malaysia ranked 1st, 2nd, and 3rd in all three indices, respectively. In addition, multivariate cluster analysis was also performed. It revealed that Singapore exhibited exceptional performance in all indices, thereby earning it a cluster all to its own. Similarities were observed between Brunei and Malaysia while Thailand, Vietnam, Philippines, and Indonesia were clustered together. Cambodia, Lao PDR, and Myanmar belonged to another cluster, indicating similarities among them. The study concluded that a wide gap exists among ASEAN countries in terms of the various deprivations measured. It also identified several problem areas and strengths of the ASEAN member states. This information can be helpful in making sound judgments especially in the delicate circumstances that surround economic integration.
References
Bourguignon, F., &Chakravarty, S. R. (2003).The measurement of multidimensional poverty. Journal of Economic Inequality,1(1), 25. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/219911067?accountid=33262
Burden, F. F. (2009). Examining parolees in their communities: Poverty, rurality, and criminal justice resources (Order No. 3374460).Available from ProQuest Central. (304986485). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304986485?accountid=33262
Callander, E. J., Schofield, D. J., &Shrestha, R. N. (2012). Towards a holistic understanding of poverty: A new multidimensional measure of poverty for australia. Health Sociology Review, 21(2), 141-155. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1040777028?accountid=33262
Foster, J., Greer, J., &Thorbecke, E. (1984). Notes and comments a class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica (Pre-1986), 52(3), 761. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/214653621?accountid=33262
Foster, J., Greer, J., &Thorbecke, E. (2010). The foster-greer-thorbecke (FGT) poverty measures: 25 years later. Journal of Economic Inequality, 8(4), 491-524. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10888-010-9136-1
Hans-Peter Weikard. (2004). Poverty measurement under income risk. JahrbücherFürNationalökonomie Und Statistik, 224(3), 337-350. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/208736046?accountid=33262
Iceland, J. (2003). Why poverty remains high: The role of income growth, economic inequality, and changes in family structure, 1949-1999*. Demography (Pre-2011), 40(3), 499-519. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/222946377?accountid=33262
Mufune, P. (2015). Poverty and HIV/AIDS in Africa: Specifying the connections. Social Theory & Health, 13(1), 1-29. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/sth.2014.14
Myanmar: Gender Equality and Development. (2013, September 1). Retrieved May 4, 2015, from http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2013/09/19/Myanmar-Gender-Equality-and-Development
National Institute of Public Health, National Institute of Statistics [Cambodia] & ORC Macro. (2006).Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2005.Phnom Penh, Cambodia and Calverton, Maryland, USA: National Institute of Public Health, National Institute of Statistics, and ORC Macro.
Pisu, M. (2012). Less income inequality and more growth - are they compatible?: Part 5. poverty in OECD countries. (). Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/917956170?accountid=33262
Santos, M. E. (2013). Tracking poverty reduction in bhutan: Income deprivation alongside deprivation in other sources of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 112(2), 259-290. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0248-4
Sen, A. (1976). POVERTY: AN ORDINAL APPROACH TO MEASUREMENT. Econometrica (Pre-1986), 44(2), 219. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/214700198?accountid=33262
Shirvanian, A., &Bakhshoodeh, M. (2012). Investigating poverty in rural iran: The multidimensional poverty approach.Agricultural Sciences, 3(5), 640-650. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1086346861?accountid=33262
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of the Journal belongs to the University of San Jose-Recoletos