The Future of Nietzsche’s Perspectivism as Political Consensus

  • Jan Gresil Kahambing Leyte Normal University
Keywords: Nietzsche, Perspectivism, Paradoxes, Political Consensus, Postmodernism


In this paper, I delve on Nietzsche’s concept of perspectivism and how it becomes relevant amid contemporary society’s openness to relative standpoints. The foremost era that reflects this description points to postmodernism as a politics of difference. Nietzsche’s perspectivism is generally a critique of the conditions that absolutize truth. While this may seem a valiant opening for a welcoming era on an epistemological standpoint, it does not however do away with its own paradoxes. I contend whether this fits well with postmodernism and its ironic relationship to truth and asserts further that the conditions for Nietzsche’s perspectivism can only achieve its future if it hermeneutically stands as political consensus. Later, I will present the features of this perspectivism as political consensus and how it can be viable in postmodernity.

Author Biography

Jan Gresil Kahambing, Leyte Normal University

Social Sciences


Abulad, R. (2004). What is Postmodernism? Abulad, R., Co, A. Two Filipino Thomasian Philosophers on Postmodernism. Manila: UST Publishing House.

Anderson, L. R. (1998). Truth and Objectivity in Perspectivism. Synthese, 115(1), 1-32.

Ashley, B. (2009). The Way Toward Wisdom: An Interdisciplinary and Intercultural Introduction to Metaphysics. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Bordo, S. (1987). The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Chaput, C. J. (2007). Religion and the Common Good. Communio, 34(1), 162-169.

Clark, M. (1990). Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Conant, J. (2005). The Dialectic of Perspectivism I. Sats – Nordic Journal of Philosophy, 6(2), 5-50.

Conant, J. (2006). The Dialectic of Perspectivism II. Sats – Nordic Journal of Philosophy 7(1), 6-57.

Cox, C. (1999). Nietzsche: Naturalism and Interpretation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

De Saint-Exupéry, A. (1943). The Little Prince. New York: Reynal & Hitchcock.

Deleuze, G. and F. Guattari (1994). What is Philosophy? (H. Tomlinson and G. Burchell, Trans.) New York: Columbia University Press.

Der Luft, E. V. (1984, April-June). Nietzsche’s “God is dead!”: And its Meaning for Heidegger. Journal of the History of Ideas, 45(2), 263-276.

Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge (S. Smith, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1971).

Gemes, K. (1992, March). Nietzsche's Critique of Truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 52(1), 47-65.

Gemes, K. (2001, March). Postmodernism’s Use and Abuse of Nietzsche. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 62(2), 337-360.

Hales, S. D., & Welshon, R. C. (1994, January). Truth, Paradox, and Nietzschean Perspectivism. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 11(1), 101-119.

Hornedo, F. (2001). The Condition of the Present: Postmodernity. The Thomasian Philosopher. Manila: UST Publishing House.

Hudgens, J. (2007). Perspectives on Perspectivism: Nietzsche and his commentators (Master’s Thesis, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.

Kant, I. (2004). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics: With selections from the Critique of Pure Reason (G. Hatfield, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1997).

Koyré, A. (1957). From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.

Leiter, B. (1994). Perspectivism in Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morals. In R. Schacht (Ed.), Nietzsche, Genealogy, Morality: Essays on Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morals. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (G. Bennington, & B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (Original work published 1979).

Marsden, J. (2002). After Nietzsche: Notes towards a Philosophy of Ecstasy. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1963). The Structure of Behaviour (A. Fisher, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1942).

Natoli, J. (1997). A Primer to Postmodernity. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.

Nietzsche, F. (1927). The Birth of Tragedy (C. P. Fadiman, Trans.). New York: Modern Library. (Original work published 1872).

Nietzsche, F. (1968). The Will to Power (W. Kaufmann, & R. J. Hollingdale, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books. (Original work published 1901).

Nietzsche, F. (1969). Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for Everyone and No One (R. J. Hollingdale, Trans.). New York: Penguin Books. (Original work publisehd 1883-1891).

Nietzsche, F. (1974). The Gay Science (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books. (Original work published 1882).

Nietzsche, F. (1976). The Portable Nietzsche (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). New York: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1954).

Nietzsche, F. (1982). Daybreak: Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality (R. J. Hollingdale, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1881).

Nietzsche, F. (1996a). Human, All Too Human: A Book for Free Spirits (R. Hollingdale, Trans.). UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1878).

Nietzsche, F. (1996b). On the Genealogy of Morals: A Polemic (D. Smith, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1887).

Nietzsche, F. (1997a). Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to the Philosophy of the Future (H. Zimmern, Trans.). New York: Dover Publications. (Original work published 1886).

Nietzsche, F. (1997b). Twilight of the Idols: Or, How to Philosophize with the Hammer (R. Polt, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett. (Original work published 1889).

Nietzsche, F. (1997c). Untimely Meditations (R. J Hollingdale, Trans.). UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1876).

Nietzsche, F. (1998). On the Genealogy of Morals (Clark and Swensen, Trans.). Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.

O’Leary, T. (2002). Foucault and the Art of Ethics. New York, Continuum.

Olson, N. (2001). Perspectivism and Truth in Nietzsche’s Philosophy: A Critical Look at the Apparent Contradiction. Retrieved last December 6, 2012 from

Pasquino, G. (2016). Consensus. doi: 10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc223

Reginster, B. (2001, January). The Paradox of Perspectivism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 62(1), 217-233.

Reginster, B. (2006). The Affirmation of Life: Nietzsche on the Overcoming of Nihilism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Schenck, D. (1985, December). Merleau-Ponty on Perspectivism with references to Nietzsche. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 46(2), 307-314.

Schreiter, R. (2005). A New Modernity: Living and Believing in an Unstable World. Unpublished manuscript, Newman Theological College, Edmonton, Alberta.

Solomon, R. (1996). Nietzsche ad hominem: Perspectivism, Personality, and Ressentiment. The Cambridge Companion to Nietzsche, 180-222. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

Solomon, R., & Higgins, K. (2000). What Nietzsche Really Said. New York: Schoken Books.

Soysal, S. (2007). Nietzsche’s Perspectivist Epistemology: Epistemological Implications of Will to Power. Doctoral Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Cankaya/Ankara, Turkey.

Swidler, L., Cobb, J., Jr., Knitter, P., & Hellwig, M. K. (1990). Death or Dialogue?: From the Age of Monologue to the Age of Dialogue. London: SCM Press.

Tassi, A. (1986). Modernity as the Transformation of Truth into Meaning. Readings in Philosophy of Man, 17-29. Manila: Ateneo de Manila University.

Wilcox, J. (1974). Truth and Value in Nietzsche: A Study of his Metaethics and Epistemology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
How to Cite
KahambingJ. G. (2017). The Future of Nietzsche’s Perspectivism as Political Consensus. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 5(2).