Discursive Strategies in Negotiating Power: The Case of a Female Radio Show Host

  • Claudette Arcelon Baluran West Visayas State University
  • Nancy Simoy Surmieda West Visayas State University
Keywords: media discourse, discourse strategies, power, solidarity

Abstract

Language as a major contestation site for power can manifest linguistic behavior between sexes to negotiate their power.  Framed within the poststructuralist framework, this study explored a female radio host’s discursive strategies to negotiate power in the context of Philippine media.  Dominant discourse strategies identified include topic control, utterance length, minimal response, and overlapping.  Topic control was utilized to dominate the flow of discourse while utterance length was used to minimize turns thereby allowing the female host to establish dominance during the live conversations. Although considered a weak discourse strategy, minimal responses were used not solely for the purpose of solidarity but to introduce the female radio show host’s ideas.  Overlapping was another strategy identified to control and negotiate power.  On an interesting note, prosodic elements were found to be likewise used to negotiate power.  The study sheds light on previously claimed weak discourse strategies identified with women.  Weak language in this study as well as discourse strategies associated with men has been found to be used by women as means to an end—as  a strategy to negotiate positions of dominance within power relations involving the opposite sex.

Author Biographies

Claudette Arcelon Baluran, West Visayas State University

Department of English, Foreign Languages, and Literary Studies, College of Arts and Sciences

Associate Professor V

Nancy Simoy Surmieda, West Visayas State University

Social Science Department

Professor III

References

Cunha, et al. (2014). He Votes or she votes? female and male discursive strategies in Twitter political hashtags. Retrieved June 12, 2016 from

Eckert, P. & Ginet-McConnet, S. (2003). Language and Gender. USA: Cambridge University Press, New York

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. New York: Longman Group UK Ltd.

Kendall, S. and Tannen, D. (2015). Discourse and gender. in The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 2nd Edition, ed. by Tannen, D., Hamilton, H., and Schiffrin, D. UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. Harper and Row, New York, N.Y.

Lakoff, R. (2003). The handbook of language and gender, ed. by Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M. USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Tannen, D. (1989). Interpreting Interruption in Conversation. Papers from the 25th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Part Two: Parasession on Language in Context, ed. byBradley Music, Randolph Graczyk, and Caroline Wiltshire, 266-87. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society

Tannen, D. (1993). Women and Men in Conversation. The Workings of Language: From Prescriptions to Perspectives, ed. by Wheeler, R. London: Praeger

Wilkinson, S. and Kitzinger, C. (2011). Conversation Analysis. Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis, ed. by Hyland, K. and Paltridge, B. London: Continuum International Publishing Group

Weedon, Cris. (2003). “Subjects”. in A Concise Companion to Feminist Theory. Ed. Eagleton, Mary. UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2003. Print.

Yieke, (2007) Gender and Topic Management in Discourse: The Glass Ceiling as a Reality for Women in Corporate Kenya. Stichproben. Wiener Zeitschrift für kritische Afrikastudien Nr. 13/2007, 7. Jg. Retrieved June 12, 2016 from https://stichproben.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/ user_upload/ p_stichproben/Artikel/Nummer13/Nr13_Yieke.pdf
Published
2017-10-11
How to Cite
BaluranC., & SurmiedaN. (2017). Discursive Strategies in Negotiating Power: The Case of a Female Radio Show Host. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj1705.01.03
Section
Articles