Government Effectiveness and Corruption Control to the Global Competitiveness Level of ASEAN Countries

Authors

  • Herben M. Tautho University of San Jose-Recoletos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj1604.01.07

Keywords:

path analysis, government effectiveness, global competitiveness, corruption control, human development, enabling trade facilitation

Abstract

This study is a validation of the varied parameters of global competitiveness level of the ASEAN countries. Government effectiveness (GE) and corruption control (CC) are the direct predictors and independent variables while global competitiveness (GC) is the response variable. The determined causal factors affected by government effectiveness and corruption control are human development (HD) and enabling trade facilitation (ETF) which have varied impacts to global competitiveness. The researcher utilized a path analysis where 6 path models were established from the predictors (x) to its response variable (y) to determine which among these factors creates a huge impact. Path coefficients were generated and the summation of value effects was determined. Findings revealed that government effectiveness and corruption control were substantial elements that influenced the dynamism and vitality of global competitiveness landscape. However, GE has a strong direct effect to GC as compared to CC and from amongst the indirect effects, the correlation between GE and HD relative to GC has the highest path coefficient. The existing economic and political conditions of the individual ASEAN member countries reflected by the implications of the raw data collected are seen as an impediment to a more collective performance. Hence, this study implies a two-fold re-evaluation and strengthening of the policy formulation and implementation individually and collectively as a regional bloc.

Author Biography

Herben M. Tautho, University of San Jose-Recoletos

A current faculty of the Senior High School department of the University of San Jose Recoletos and is the cluster head for Humanities and Social Sciences (HUMSS) and the Technical, Vocational and Livelihood (TVL) track.

References

Amadeo, K., (2017). Trade Protectionism: 4 Methods with Examples, Pros and Cons, From https://www.thebalance.com/what-is-trade-protectionism-3305896

Asongu, S. A. (2013). Fighting corruption in africa: Do existing corruption-control levels matter? International Journal of Development Issues, 12(1), 36-52. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14468951311322109

Boone, P., (1995) Politics and the Effectiveness of Foreign Aid, from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/20690/1/Politics_and_the_Effectiveness_of_Foreign_Aid.pdf

Butler, B. (2001, Dec 14). It is all about competitiveness, competitiveness, competitiveness. Irish Times Retrieved from https://ezproxy.usjr.edu.ph:2293/docview/309424640?accountid=33262

Collins, M., (2015). The Pros and Cons of Globalization, from http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikecollins/2015/05/06/the-pros-and-cons-of-globalization/#519609092170

Furr, N., Dyer, J. (2015). Can Governments Innovate? From https://www.forbes.com/sites/innovatorsdna/2015/04/16/can-governments-innovate/#1caf40dc7889

Graycar, A., & Sidebottom, A. (2012). Corruption and control: A corruption reduction approach. Journal of Financial Crime, 19(4), 384-399. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13590791211266377

Henisz, W. (2002), "The institutional environment for infrastructure investment", Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 355-89.

http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi

http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#homehttp://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_ASEAN_HumanCapitalOutlook.pdf

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/01/globalization-has-left-people-behind-this-is-what-we-should-do-about-it

http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GETR_2016_report.pdf

Kiggundu, M. N., & Uruthirapathy, A. (2010). Canada's global and business competitiveness: Competition policy reform in a changing world. Competitiveness Review, 20(4), 288-304. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10595421011065307

Kueppper, J., (2017). What is Protectionism? From https://www.thebalance.com/what-is-protectionism-1978989

Pillania, R. K. (2009). Competitiveness and emerging markets. Business Strategy Series, 10(2), 90-95. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17515630910942214

Pologeorgis, N., (2017). How Globalization Affects Developed Countries, From http://www.investopedia.com/articles/economics/10/globalization-developed-countries.asp

Plumper, T., & Martin, C. W. (2003). Democracy, government spending, and economic growth: A political-economic explanation of the barro-effect. Public Choice, 117(1-2), 27-50. Retrieved from https://ezproxy.usjr.edu.ph:2293/docview/207128320?accountid=33262

Shah, S., (2016). Competition: Characteristics, Value and Function, From http://www.sociologydiscussion.com/sociology/competition-characteristics-value-and-function/2218

Suci, S. C., Asmara, A., & Mulatsih, S. (2015). The impact of globalization on economic growth in ASEAN. Bisnis & Birokrasi, 22(2), 79-87. Retrieved from https://ezproxy.usjr.edu.ph:2293/docview/1845146409?accountid=33262

Wuensch, K., (2016). An Introduction to Path Analysis, from http://core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/MV/SEM/Path.pdf

Zadjali, M. A., & Wright, C. S. (2012). A new paradigm of corruption to aid in its control and dispel its sweet-spot myth. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 9(1), 34-51. Retrieved from https://ezproxy.usjr.edu.ph:2293/docview/1019050893?accountid=33262

Downloads

Published

2016-06-30

How to Cite

Tautho, H. M. (2016). Government Effectiveness and Corruption Control to the Global Competitiveness Level of ASEAN Countries. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj1604.01.07

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.