Screening Indicators for an Improved Faculty Accomplishment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj1604.01.10Keywords:
faculty accomplishment, screened indicators, improved accomplishment, pca on achievement, ipoo on faculty accomplishmentAbstract
This study determined the indicators for an improved faculty accomplishment based on selected profile (age, the number of years of teaching, performance rating, and salary), Common Criteria for Evaluation or CCE (educational qualification, professional achievements, and academic experience) and Qualitative Contribution Evaluation (QCE) ratings. One hundred percent (160) of faculty with ratings in the NBC- 461 6th cycle comprised the respondent which was evidently adequate as sample based on Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) results. The Bartlett’s test of sphericity indicates that variables are well-defined for Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The pre-defined indicators were categorized as indexes labeled as Input-Process-Output-Outcome. Results show that change in the Outcome of HE varies depending on the variables involved in the analysis. Considering full data, data with QCE and data of senior faculty, Inputs, Processes, and Outputs significantly contribute towards an improved (Outcome) faculty accomplishment (FA). The analysis on junior faculty (JF), showed that only Inputs and Outputs were significantly affecting change on Outcome of HE. Moreover, the most significantly affecting indicators towards faculty accomplishments are performance rating, age, and number of years of teaching. Then educational qualification followed, next are professional achievement and academic experience, and lastly the QCE.
References
Bass, J. (2001). Faculty Compensation Systems: Impact on the Quality of Higher Education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Volume 28, Number 2.
Boyd, D.J., Lankford,Hm, Loeb, S., Rockoff, J.E., and Wyckoff, J.H. (2007.) “The Narrowing Gap in New York City Teacher Qualifications and Its Implications for Student Achievement in High-Poverty Schools.†CALDER Working Paper 10. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Clotfelter, C.T., Ladd, H.F., and Vigdor, J.L.(2007a). “How and Why Do Teacher Credentials Matter for Student Achievement?†CALDER Working Paper 2. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Clotfelter, C.T., Ladd, H.F., and Vigdor, J.L. (2007b). “Teacher Credentials and Student Achievement in High School: A Cross-Subject Analysis with Student Fixed Effects.†CALDER Working Paper 11. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Dill, D. and F. Van Vught (eds) (2010), National Innovation and the Academic Research Enterprise; Public Policy in Global Perspective, the Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Garvin, D.D. 1998. The Processes of Organization and Management. MITSloan Management Review.http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-processes-of-organization-and- management/
Griffin, C.C., Kilgore, K.L, Winn, J.A., Wilborn, A.O., Hou, W. &Garvan, C.W. (2015). First Year Special Educators: The Influence of School and Classroom Context Factors on their Accomplishments and Problems. June 14, 2015 5: 2158244015589994.
Harris, D.N., and T.R. Sass. (2007). “Teacher Training, Teacher Quality, and Student Achievement.†CALDER Working Paper 3. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Jollifee, I.T. 2002. Principal Component Analysis, 2nd Edition. USA: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
Kane, T.J., Rockoff, J.E. and D.O. Staiger. (2006). “What Does Certification Tell Us about Teacher Effectiveness? Evidence from New York City.†Working Paper 12155. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Lackritz, J.R. (2004). Information and Decision Systems, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182-8234, USA. Available online 28 September 2004
Ladd, H.F. (2008). “Value-Added Modeling of Teacher Credentials: Policy Implications.†Paper presented at the second annual CALDER research conference, “The Ins and Outs of Value-Added Measures in Education: What Research Says,†Washington, D.C., November 21. http://www. caldercenter.org/upload/Sunny_Ladd_ presentation.pdf.
Memorandum Circular 17, s. 2013. Civil Service Commission.
National Budget Circular No. 461 Guidelines. June 1, 1998. Department of Budget and Management.
Ramsden, P. (2006). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire. Journal on Studies in Higher Education. Volume 16, 1991 - Issue 2. August 5, 2006.
Reece, E. A., Nugent, O., Wheeler, R.P., Smith, C. W., Hough, A.J.,Winter, C. (2008). Adapting Industry-Style Business Model to Academia in a System of Performance-Based Incentive Compensation. Association of American Medical Colleges. January 2008;83(1):76-84.
Rise, JK. (2010). The impact of teacher experience: examining the evidence and policy implications. National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research. Calder Urban Institute. BRIEF 11. August 2010.
Sass, T.R. (2007). “The Determinants of Student Achievement: Different Estimates for Different Measures.†Paper presented at the first annual CALDER research conference, Washington, D.C., October 4.
Sass, T.R., Zeyu Xu, J.H., Figlio, D.N., and Feng, L. (2010). “Value Added of Teachers in High-Poverty Schools and Lower-Poverty Schools.†CALDER Working Paper 52. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Smock, P.J. and R. Stephenson.(n.d.). Giving and Getting Career Advice: A Guide for Junior and Senior Faculty. The Advance Program. University of Michigan. Retrieved: April 15, 2017 @ advanceprogram@umich.edu.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam& T. Kellaghan (Eds.). The international handbook of educational evaluation (Chapter 2). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Tang, T.LP. (1997). Teaching Evaluation at a Public Institution of Higher Education: Factors Related to the Overall Teaching Effectiveness. doi: 10.1177/009102609702600307Public Personnel Management September 1997 vol. 26 no. 3 379-389
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of the Journal belongs to the University of San Jose-Recoletos
