Macro and Micro Context Factors in English Language Learning in Modular Distance Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj2109.02.02Keywords:
modular distance learning, factors in learning, English language learning, factor analysisAbstract
English proficiency has been a complex skill to develop in a face-to-face setting, especially in the remote learning modality. This descriptive-correlational study aims to determine the various macro and micro context factors in English language learning of secondary students (n=189) under modular distance learning. Factor analysis is utilized in extracting the following factor loadings for macro-context: a) lack of assistance from more knowledgeable others, b) unconducive-to-learning environment, c) cultural influence, d) poor feedback mechanism, e) insufficient resources, and f) low quality of the self-learning kit. Micro-context factors constitute the following: a) lack of exposure and practice, b) lack of perceived competence, c) lack of motivation and d) lack of interest. Students employed self-regulated strategies and managed to overcome these challenges through a) commitment to practice the skill, b) self-evaluation strategies, and c) social strategies. Students’ context should be considered in the teaching and learning process.
References
Alizadeh, M. (2016). The impact of motivation on English language learning. International Journal of Research in English Education, 1(1), 11-15. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Impact-of-Motivation-on-English-Language-Alizadeh/5ee2d429eb37bda7fd2844854118ed73c7b47b17
Al-Khazaalia, H. M. K. (2020). An exploratory study of micro-context and macro-context barriers to teaching the English language in Iraqi EFL high school framework. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity, and Change, 11(3), 13-28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339781439_An_Exploratory_Study_of_Micro-_Context_and_MacroContext_Barriers_to_Teaching_English_Language_in_Iraqi_EFL_High_School_Framework
Costley, K. C. (2014). The positive effects of technology on teaching and student learning. Arkansas Tech University (ED554557). ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED554557
El-Omari, A. H. (2016). Factors affecting students' achievement in English language learning. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 6(2), 9-17. https://doi.org/ 10.5901/jesr.2016.v6n2p9
Frans, T. H. (2016). Barriers to learning English as a second language in two higher learning institutions in Namibia [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Africa Pretoria]. University of South Africa Institutional Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/20190
Gaerlan, M.J. (2016, March 7-9). Learning in A L2: An analysis of less successful Filipino ESL learners’ experiences through consensual qualitative research [Paper presentation]. De La Salle University Research Congress, Manila, Philippines. https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/pdf/conferences/research-congress-proceedings/2016/LLI/LLI-II-01.pdf
Ghadirzadeh, R., Hashtroudi, F. P., & Shokri, O. (2012). Demotivating factors for English language learning among university students. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 189-195. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2012.189.195
Gilakjani, A. P. (2017). A review of the literature on the integration of technology into the Learning and teaching of English language skills. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(5), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n5p95
Genc, G., & Aydin, S. (2011). Students' motivation toward computer-based language learning. International Journal of Educational Reform, 20(2), 171-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678791102000205
Harb, N., El-Shaarawi, A. (2007). Factors affecting business students' performance: The case of students in United Arab Emirates. Journal of Education for Business, 82(5), 282 – 290. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.82.5.282-290
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
Jiang, L., Zhang, L. J., & May, S. (2019). Implementing English-medium instruction (EMI) in China: Teachers' practices and perceptions, and students' learning motivation and needs. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(2), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1231166
Joaquin, J. J. B., Biana, H. T., & Dacela, M. A. (2020). The Philippine higher education sector in the time of COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.576371
Jugo, R. R. (2020). Language anxiety in focus: The case of Filipino undergraduate teacher education learners. Education Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7049837
Kirmizi, O. (2014). Self-regulated learning strategies employed by regular, evening, and distance education English language and literature students. The Anthropologist, 18(2), 447-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2014.11891563
Khan, I. A. (2016). Barriers in the learning of English: An exploratory study. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 15(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJESBS/2016/23743
Lestari, M., & Wahyudin, A. Y. (2020). Language learning strategies of undergraduate EFL students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v1i1.242
Lin, C. J., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). A learning analytics approach to investigating factors affecting EFL students' oral performance in a flipped classroom. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 205-219. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2147859362
Magno, C., Lajom, J. A. L., & de Carvalho Filho, M. K. (2011). Factors involved in the use of language learning strategies and oral proficiency among Taiwanese students in Taiwan and in the Philippines. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(3), 489-502.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277405267_Factors_Involved_in_the_Use_of_Language_Learning_Strategies_and_Oral_Proficiency_Among_Taiwanese_Students_in_Taiwan_and_in_the_Philippines
Marcum, J., & Kim, Y. (2020). Oral language proficiency in distance English-language learning. CALICO Journal, 37(2), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.37788
Misbah, N. H., Mohamad, M., Yunus, M. M., & Ya’acob, A. (2017). Identifying the factors contributing to students’ difficulties in the English language learning. Creative Education, 8(13), 1999-2008. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.813136
Musingafi, M.C.C., Mapuranga, B., Chiwanza, K., & Zebron, S. (2015). Challenges for open and distance learning (ODL) students: Experiences from students of the Zimbabwe Open University. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(18), 59-66. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1079750.pdf
Mosha, M. A. (2014). Factors affecting students' performance in the English language in Zanzibar rural and urban secondary schools. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(35), 64-76. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/17455/17714
Natalia, K., & Julia, O. (2018). New use of MOODLE tools for distance English language learning (experience of Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University). In 18th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference (SGEM 2018): Conference proceedings volume 18 (pp.225-232). https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2018/5.4/S22.029
Parvin, R. H., & Salam, S. F. (2015). The effectiveness of using technology in English language classrooms in government primary schools in Bangladesh. FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education, 2(1), 47-59. https://doi.org/ 10.18275/fire201502011049
Phuong, Y. H., & Vo, P. Q. (2019). Students' learning autonomy, involvement, and motivation towards their English proficiency. Edulite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 4(1), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/e.4.1-12
Picardal, M. T. (2019). Does conceptual change process of instruction promote scientific understanding of biological evolution? Liceo Journal of Higher Education Research, 15(2), 131-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.7828/ljher.v15n2.1326
Racca, R. M. A. B., & Lasaten, R. C. S. (2016). English language proficiency and academic performance of Philippine science high school students. International Journal of Languages, Literature, and Linguistics, 2(2), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlll.2016.2.2.65
Sadiq, S., & Zamir, S. (2014). Effectiveness of modular approach in teaching at the university level. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(17), 103-109. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338065543_Effectiveness_of_Modular_Approach_in_Teaching_at_University_Level
Shum, M. S., Gao, F., Tsung, L., & Ki, W. W. (2011). South Asian students' Chinese language learning in Hong Kong: Motivations and strategies. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 32(3), 285-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2010.539693
Salie, M., Moletsane, M., & Mukuna, R.K. (2020). Case study of isiXhosa-speaking Foundation Phase learners who experience barriers to learning in an English-medium disadvantaged Western Cape school. South African Journal of Education, 40(2),1-9. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v40n2a1455
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of the Journal belongs to the University of San Jose-Recoletos