Macro and Micro Context Factors in English Language Learning in Modular Distance Learning

Keywords: modular distance learning, factors in learning, English language learning, factor analysis


English proficiency has been a complex skill to develop in a face-to-face setting, especially in the remote learning modality. This descriptive-correlational study aims to determine the various macro and micro context factors in English language learning of secondary students (n=189) under modular distance learning. Factor analysis is utilized in extracting the following factor loadings for macro-context: a) lack of assistance from more knowledgeable others, b) unconducive-to-learning environment, c) cultural influence, d) poor feedback mechanism, e) insufficient resources, and f) low quality of the self-learning kit. Micro-context factors constitute the following: a) lack of exposure and practice, b) lack of perceived competence, c) lack of motivation and d) lack of interest. Students employed self-regulated strategies and managed to overcome these challenges through a) commitment to practice the skill, b) self-evaluation strategies, and c) social strategies. Students’ context should be considered in the teaching and learning process.


Altunay, D. (2014). Language learning strategies used by distance learners of English: A study with a group of Turkish distance learners of EFL. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 291-305.

Alizadeh, M. (2016). The impact of motivation on English language learning. International Journal of Research in English Education, 1(1), 11-15.

Al-Khazaalia, H. M. K. (2020). An exploratory study of micro-context and macro-context barriers to teaching the English language in Iraqi EFL high school framework. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity, and Change, 11(3), 13-28.
Costley, K. C. (2014). The positive effects of technology on teaching and student learning. Arkansas Tech University (ED554557). ERIC.

El-Omari, A. H. (2016). Factors affecting students' achievement in English language learning. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 6(2), 9-17. 10.5901/jesr.2016.v6n2p9
Frans, T. H. (2016). Barriers to learning English as a second language in two higher learning institutions in Namibia [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Africa Pretoria]. University of South Africa Institutional Repository.

Gaerlan, M.J. (2016, March 7-9). Learning in A L2: An analysis of less successful Filipino ESL learners’ experiences through consensual qualitative research [Paper presentation]. De La Salle University Research Congress, Manila, Philippines.

Ghadirzadeh, R., Hashtroudi, F. P., & Shokri, O. (2012). Demotivating factors for English language learning among university students. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 189-195.

Gilakjani, A. P. (2017). A review of the literature on the integration of technology into the Learning and teaching of English language skills. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(5), 95-106.

Genc, G., & Aydin, S. (2011). Students' motivation toward computer-based language learning. International Journal of Educational Reform, 20(2), 171-189.

Harb, N., El-Shaarawi, A. (2007). Factors affecting business students' performance: The case of students in United Arab Emirates. Journal of Education for Business, 82(5), 282 – 290.
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83-101.

Jiang, L., Zhang, L. J., & May, S. (2019). Implementing English-medium instruction (EMI) in China: Teachers' practices and perceptions, and students' learning motivation and needs. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(2), 107-119.

Joaquin, J. J. B., Biana, H. T., & Dacela, M. A. (2020). The Philippine higher education sector in the time of COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 5.

Jugo, R. R. (2020). Language anxiety in focus: The case of Filipino undergraduate teacher education learners. Education Research International.

Kirmizi, O. (2014). Self-regulated learning strategies employed by regular, evening, and distance education English language and literature students. The Anthropologist, 18(2), 447-460.

Khan, I. A. (2016). Barriers in the learning of English: An exploratory study. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 15(2), 1-10.

Lestari, M., & Wahyudin, A. Y. (2020). Language learning strategies of undergraduate EFL students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 25-30.

Lin, C. J., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). A learning analytics approach to investigating factors affecting EFL students' oral performance in a flipped classroom. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 205-219.

Magno, C., Lajom, J. A. L., & de Carvalho Filho, M. K. (2011). Factors involved in the use of language learning strategies and oral proficiency among Taiwanese students in Taiwan and in the Philippines. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(3), 489-502.
Marcum, J., & Kim, Y. (2020). Oral language proficiency in distance English-language learning. CALICO Journal, 37(2), 148–168.

Misbah, N. H., Mohamad, M., Yunus, M. M., & Ya’acob, A. (2017). Identifying the factors contributing to students’ difficulties in the English language learning. Creative Education, 8(13), 1999-2008.

Musingafi, M.C.C., Mapuranga, B., Chiwanza, K., & Zebron, S. (2015). Challenges for open and distance learning (ODL) students: Experiences from students of the Zimbabwe Open University. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(18), 59-66.

Mosha, M. A. (2014). Factors affecting students' performance in the English language in Zanzibar rural and urban secondary schools. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(35), 64-76.

Natalia, K., & Julia, O. (2018). New use of MOODLE tools for distance English language learning (experience of Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University). In 18th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference (SGEM 2018): Conference proceedings volume 18 (pp.225-232).

Parvin, R. H., & Salam, S. F. (2015). The effectiveness of using technology in English language classrooms in government primary schools in Bangladesh. FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education, 2(1), 47-59. 10.18275/fire201502011049

Phuong, Y. H., & Vo, P. Q. (2019). Students' learning autonomy, involvement, and motivation towards their English proficiency. Edulite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 4(1), 1-12.

Picardal, M. T. (2019). Does conceptual change process of instruction promote scientific understanding of biological evolution? Liceo Journal of Higher Education Research, 15(2), 131-153.

Racca, R. M. A. B., & Lasaten, R. C. S. (2016). English language proficiency and academic performance of Philippine science high school students. International Journal of Languages, Literature, and Linguistics, 2(2), 44-49.

Sadiq, S., & Zamir, S. (2014). Effectiveness of modular approach in teaching at the university level. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(17), 103-109.

Shum, M. S., Gao, F., Tsung, L., & Ki, W. W. (2011). South Asian students' Chinese language learning in Hong Kong: Motivations and strategies. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 32(3), 285-297.

Salie, M., Moletsane, M., & Mukuna, R.K. (2020). Case study of isiXhosa-speaking Foundation Phase learners who experience barriers to learning in an English-medium disadvantaged Western Cape school. South African Journal of Education, 40(2),1-9.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon.
How to Cite
SespeneM. N., OyangorenH., NarnolaR. M., & PicardalM. (2021). Macro and Micro Context Factors in English Language Learning in Modular Distance Learning. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 9(2).