Judicial Resolution of Cases in Small Scale Financial Claims: The Malaysian Experience

  • Glenda E. Feliprada Universiti Putra Malaysia
  • Jayum Anak Jawan Universiti Putra Malaysia
Keywords: Small Claims Procedures


This paper presents the assessment of the Malaysian experience on the implementation of the Small Claims Procedures. This covers the magistrate courts of Kuala Lumpur, Shah Alam and Johor Bharu as the major cities of Malaysia. Small Claims Procedure plaintiff is an individual person who is not an agent or assignee of any debt of another person.  (Order 93, Rules of Court 2012 r. 1.2).   The money involved in cases without intervention of a solicitor or advocate is less than RM 5,000.00 (USD 1,168.91). Order 93, Rules of Court 2012 refined mechanism is in its 32 years in implementation since 1980 it was first adopted.  The major challenge is information dissemination. The Malaysian’s Small Claim Procedures implements warrant of arrest and imprisons the defendant for failure to comply court order. The beneficiaries are individual persons instead of lending corporations.

Author Biography

Jayum Anak Jawan, Universiti Putra Malaysia
Faculty of Human Ecology


Armitage, D. (2004). John Locke, Carolina, and the two treatises of government. Political Theory, 32(5), 602–627. Retrieved last June 7, 2018 from https://scholar.harvard.edu/armitage/publications/john-locke-carolina-and-two-treatises-government

Deril, H. (2015). Malaysian judiciary-reforms undertaken to improve performance, benefits and challenges [Powerpoint slides]. Retrieved lastJune 13, 2018 from mddb.apec.org/Documents/2012/EC/WKSP1/12_ec_wksp1_015.pdf

Hewart, C. J. (1924). R v Sussex justices, ex p Mc Carthy 1 KB 256. Retrieved from http://lawhelpbd.com/case/r-v-sussex-justices-ex-p-mccarthy/

High Court of Malaysia, & High Court of Sabah and Sarawak. (2012). Rules of court 2012. Retrieved from https://zulkiflihasan.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/rules-of-court-2012-01-07-2012.pdf

Metropolitan Properties Co (FGC) Ltd v Lannon (BAILII: [1968] EWCA Civ 4 ) [1968] RVR 490, [1968] EWCA Civ 5, [1968] 3 All ER 304, [1968] 3 WLR 694, (1968) 19 P & CR 856, [1969] 1 QB 577.

Mohamed, A. (2015). Court reform programmes: The Malaysian experience. Retrieved last June 13, 2018 from journals.sas.ac.uk/amicus/article/download/2432/2394

Pheng, L. (2005). General principles of Malaysian law (5th ed.). Malaysia: Penerbit Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd.

Rohl, K, (1990). Small claims courts: A comparative study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Siva, B. (2008). Undertaking comprehensive judicial reform. Retrieved from http://www.malaysianbar.org.my/members_opinions_and_comments/undertaking_comprehensive_judicial_reform.html?date=2018-05-01

Tew, Y. (2011). The Malaysian legal system: A tale of two courts. Retrieved last June 13, 2018 from https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgiarticle=2944&context=facpub

Wang, C. (2000). When the Malaysian judiciary blinks. Retrieved last June 7, 2018 from http://wanglaw.net/files/Malaysia2.pdf

Whelan, C. (1990). Small claims courts a comparative study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

World Bank. (2011). MALAYSIA - court backlog and delay reduction program: A progress report. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/16791

Yahya, A. (2008) The dangers of debt. Retrieved last June 7, 2018 from
How to Cite
Feliprada, G., & Jawan, J. A. (2018). Judicial Resolution of Cases in Small Scale Financial Claims: The Malaysian Experience. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 6(1). Retrieved from http://rmrj.usjr.edu.ph/index.php/RMRJ/article/view/276